中国猪业 ›› 2026, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (5): 80-91.doi: 10.16174/j.issn.1673-4645.2026.05.004

• 营养饲料 • 上一篇    下一篇

发酵竹粉对育肥猪生长性能、养分表观消化率等方面的影响

汪审岳1,李凯2,3*,吴盈盈1,史凯2,周潇2,戴久丽2,陈淑芳2,秦宏钿4   

  1. 1宁海县动物卫生监督所,浙江宁波315600;2宁波市农业科学研究院,浙江宁波315040;3中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所/畜禽营养与饲养全国重点实验室,北京100193;4宁波市三鑫牧业有限公司,浙江宁波315601
  • 出版日期:2026-11-13 发布日期:2026-10-25
  • 作者简介:汪审岳 (1977-),男,本科,兽医师,研究方向为畜牧兽医动物医学

Effects of fermented bamboo powder on growth performance, apparent nutrient digestibility and other aspects of finishing pigs

WANG Shenyue1, LI Kai2,3*, WU Yingying1, SHI Kai2, ZHOU Xiao2, DAI Jiuli2, CHEN Shufang2, QIN HongDian4   

  1. 1Ninghai Institute of Animal Health Supervision, Ningbo 315600, China; 2Ningbo Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ningbo 315040, China; 3Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/ State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Beijing 100193, China; 4Ningbo Sanxin Animal Husbandry Co., Ltd., Ningbo 315601, China
  • Online:2026-11-13 Published:2026-10-25

摘要: 本研究旨在探究发酵竹粉对育肥猪生长性能、养分表观消化率、血清生化指标及粪便微生物的影响。选取日龄和体重相近的健康“杜×长×大”三元杂交育肥猪144头,随机均分为3个处理组,每组6个重复,每个重复8头猪。对照组饲喂基础饲粮,2个试验组在基础饲粮中分别添加3%和5%的发酵竹粉,分别为CON组、FBP3组和FBP5组。结果显示,与CON组相比,FBP3组和FBP5组育肥猪的终末体重显著降低(P<0.05),FBP5组的平均日增重显著低于CON组(P<0.05),FBP3组和FBP5组的平均日采食量均低于CON组,且FBP5组的平均日采食量低于FBP3组,但均未达到显著水平(P>0.05)。FBP3组和FBP5组育肥猪的干物质、粗蛋白质、粗脂肪、粗灰分及总能的表观消化率显著高于CON组(P<0.05)。与CON组相比,FBP5组血清葡萄糖含量显著降低(P<0.05),FBP5组血清甘油三酯含量显著提高(P<0.05),同时,FBP3组血清中丙二醛含量显著升高(P<0.05),总抗氧化能力显著降低(P<0.05)。与CON组相比,FBP3组和FBP5组Shannon指数显著提高、Simpson指数显著降低(P<0.05),FBP5组链球菌属的相对丰度显著降低,FBP3组和FBP5组梭菌属、特里斯孢菌属的相对丰度显著提高(P<0.05)。结果表明,发酵竹粉可通过调控肠道微生物微生态改善育肥猪肠道健康,促进营养物质消化利用,为避免发酵竹粉纤维含量高、营养浓度低而引起的育肥猪采食量下降影响其生长速度,发酵竹粉在饲粮中添加比例不宜超过3%。

关键词: 发酵竹粉, 育肥猪, 生长性能, 养分消化率, 粪便微生物

Abstract: This study aimed to investigate the effects of fermented bamboo powder on growth performance, apparent nutrient digestibility, serum biochemical indices and fecal microbiota of finishing pigs. A total of 144 healthy “Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire” cross‑bred finishing pigs with similar age and body weight were randomly assigned to three treatment groups, with six replicates per group and eight pigs per replicate. Pigs in the control group were fed a basal diet, while the two experimental groups were fed basal diets supplemented with 3% and 5% fermented bamboo powder, designated as CON, FBP3 and FBP5 groups, respectively. Compared with the CON group, final body weight was significantly decreased in FBP3 and FBP5 groups (P<0.05), and average daily gain was significantly lower in the FBP5 group (P<0.05). The average daily feed intake (ADFI) in the FBP3 and FBP5 groups was lower than that in the CON group. The ADFI of the FBP5 group was lower than that of the FBP3 group, but the differences were not significant (P>0.05). The apparent digestibility of dry matter, crude protein, ether extract, ash and gross energy in FBP3 and FBP5 groups was significantly higher than that in the CON group (P<0.05). For serum parameters, serum glucose concentration was significantly reduced while serum triglyceride concentration was significantly elevated in the FBP5 group (P<0.05). Meanwhile, the FBP3 group exhibited significantly higher serum malondialdehyde content and significantly lower total antioxidant capacity (P<0.05). In terms of fecal microbiota, Shannon index was significantly increased and the Simpson index was significantly decreased in FBP3 and FBP5 groups (P<0.05). The relative abundance of Streptococcus was significantly reduced in the FBP5 group, whereas the relative abundances of Clostridium and Terrisporobacter were significantly increased in both FBP3 and FBP5 groups (P<0.05). Fermented bamboo powder can improve intestinal health and promote nutrient digestion and utilization of finishing pigs by regulating intestinal microecology. Considering that the high fiber content and low nutritional concentration of fermented bamboo powder may reduce feed intake and further impair the growth rate of finishing pigs, the supplemental level of fermented bamboo powder in finishing pig diets should not exceed 3%.

Key words: fermented bamboo powder, finishing pigs, growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal microbiota

中图分类号:  S828;S816.4

[1] 杨凤娟, 王祖力, 谯仕彦. 2025年生猪产业与技术发展状况[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2026, 62(3): 358-362. YANG F J, WANG Z L, QIAO S Y. Status of china’s pig industry and technological development in 2025[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2026, 62(3): 358-362. [2] 杨凤娟, 励汀郁, 王明利, 等. 大食物观下畜牧水产业发展空间潜力的拓展研究[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2025, 61(4): 391-396. YANG F J, LI T Y, WANG M L, et al. Research on expanding the development space and potential of animal husbandry and aquaculture under the greater food outlook[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2025, 61(4): 391-396. [3] 张宏福, 吴维达, 张莉, 等. 日粮纤维调节猪肠道微生物和肠黏膜屏障功能的研究进展[J]. 饲料工业, 2019, 40(1): 2-12. ZHANG H F, WU W D, ZHANG L, et al. Dietary fiber regulates intestinal microbiota and intestinal barrier function in pigs: a review. Feed Industry, 2019, 40(1): 2-12. [4] 张佳瑞, 徐晓锋, 张力莉. 饲粮纤维源短链脂肪酸对单胃动物肠道健康的调控作用[J]. 动物营养学报, 2026, 38(7): 4816-4826. ZHANG J R, XU X F, ZHANG L L. Regulatory effects of dietary fiber-derived short-chain fatty acids on gut health of monogastric animals[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2026, 38(7): 4816-4826. [5] 杨洁妤, 王文良, 谭碧娥. 竹资源饲料化技术及其在动物养殖中的应用[J]. 动物营养学报: 1-13. YANG Y J, WANG W L, TAN B E. Feed utilization technologies of bamboo resources and their applications in animal production[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2026, 38(8):5637-5649. [6] 代发文, 杨瑶君, 江奕, 等. 竹纤维饲料原料的开发应用研究进展[J]. 中国饲料, 2020, (23): 112-116. DAI F W, YANG Y J, JIANG Y, et al. Development of application research in bamboo fiber feed materials and their prospects[J]. China Feed, 2020(23): 112-116. [7] 韩倩男, 梁赐, 申娜娜, 等. 竹粉饲料的营养特性及其在畜禽生产中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2026, 62(7): 72-77. HAN Q N, LIANG C, SHEN N N, et al. Advances in nutritional characteristics of bamboo powder feed and its application in livestock and poultry production[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2026, 62(7): 72-77. [8] 周雨歆, 杨伟涛, 陈丹丹, 等. 纤维降解菌对竹粉青贮发酵品质和营养成分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(10): 3448-3454. ZHOU Y X, YANG W T, CHEN D D, et al. Effects of Bacillus safensis and Cellulomonas iranensis bacteria on the fermentation quality of bamboo powder silage[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(10): 3448-3454. [9] LIU Z Q, LI N, ZHOU X Q, et al. Effects of fermented bamboo powder supplementation on serum biochemical parameters, immune indices, and fecal microbial composition in growing-finishing pigs[J]. Animals, 2022, 12(22): 3127. [10] ZHENG Z, LIU Z Q, LI N, et al. Effects of fermented bamboo powder on growth performance, apparent digestibility, carcass traits, and meat quality in growing-finishing pigs[J]. Livestock Science, 2023, 277: 105358. [11] TANG R, ZHAO J F, YANG Y, et al. Effects of low-level replacement of corn with dried bamboo shoot powder on growth performance, nutrient utilization, carcass traits, pork quality, and colonic responses in growing-finishing pigs[J]. Veterinary Sciences, 2026, 13(8): 763. [12] RAHMANI M M, DING W, WEI Q W, et al. Impact of fermented bamboo powder on the morphology and physiology of the gastrointestinal tract in yellow-feather broiler chickens[J]. Poultry Science, 2025, 104(2): 104793. [13] SHOURA H E, DING W, HOU L S, et al. Fermented bamboo powder affects dwarf yellow-feathered broiler growth, blood biochemistry, antioxidant status, intestinal morphology, and nutrient transporter gene expression[J]. Agriculture, 2025, 15(3): 240. [14] 王梦华, 叶炜斌, 黄文庆, 等. 不同蛋白质源替代鱼粉对牛蛙生长性能、血清生化指标及肝脏和肠道健康的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2026, 38(5): 3592-3607. WANG M H, YE W B, HUANG W Q, et al. Effects of different protein sources replacing fish meal on growth performance, serum biochemical indices, liver and intestinal health of bullfrog(Aquarana catesbeiana)[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2026, 38(5): 3592-3607. [15] 樊启文, 刘泽鹏, 陈芳, 等. 发酵构树对育肥猪生长性能、血清生化指标、屠宰性能、肉品质及肌纤维特性的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2025, 37(12): 8187-8197. FAN Q W, LIU Z P, CHEN F, et al. Effects of fermented Broussonetia papyrifera on growth performance, serum biochemical indexes, slaughter performance, meat quality and muscle fiber characteristics of finishing pigs[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2025, 37(12): 8187-8197. [16] 陈娇. 发酵竹粉对猪生长性能、肉品质及肠道微生物菌群的影响[D]. 南昌:江西农业大学, 2024. CHEN J. Effect of fermented bamboo powder on the growth performance, meat quality and intestinal microflora in pigs[D]. Nanchang: Jiangxi Agricultural University, 2024. [17] DAI F W, YANG S Q, JIN M Q, et al. Effects of micronized bamboo powder on performance, nutrient utilization, intestinal histology, and cecal microbiota in laying hens[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2026, 17: 1865359. [18] WAN F, WEN X B, TANG S L, et al. Chemically protected sodium butyrate supplementation improves anti-inflammatory and antioxidant capacities potentially through modulating gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids levels in piglets[J]. Journal of Functional Foods, 2024, 121: 106434. [19] YIN C, LIU X, FANG W, et al. Hyocholic acid species as the key modulator for cecal epithelial homeostasis in low-birth-weight piglets[J]. Nutrients, 2025, 17: 3415. [20] 张家庆, 王献伟, 刘赛安, 等. 姜黄素对育肥猪生长性能、养分消化率和粪便微生物数量的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(4): 24-30. ZHANG J Q, WANG X W, LIU S A, et al. Effects of curcumin on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and fecal microbial quantity of fattening pigs[J]. China Swine Industry, 2025, 20(4): 24-30. [21] ZHANG S F, TANG S L, HAN H, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri SKLAN202402ZF inhibited by early-life lincomycin exposure alleviate intestinal damage and inflammation sensitivity[J]. Microbiome, 2026, 14(1): 87. [22] GAO Q T, SUN G M, DUAN J J, et al. Alterations in gut microbiota improve SCFA production and fiber utilization in Tibetan pigs fed alfalfa diet[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2022, 13: 969524. [23] HU R Q, LI S W, DIAO H, et al. The interaction between dietary fiber and gut microbiota, and its effect on pig intestinal health[J]. Frontiers in Immunology, 2023, 14: 1095740. [24] LI J, ZHANG S, GU X, et al. Effects of alfalfa levels on carcass traits, meat quality, fatty acid composition, amino acid profile, and gut microflora composition of Heigai pigs[J]. Frontiers in Nutrition, 2022, 9: 975455. [25] 林汉澍, 曹山川, 尹恒, 等. 花椒叶营养价值评定及其对妊娠母猪繁殖性能的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2025, 37(12): 8217-8230. LIN H S, CAO S C, YIN H, et al. Evaluation of nutritional values of Zanthoxylum bungeanum leaves and their effects on reproductive performance of pregnant sows[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2025, 37(12): 8217-8230. [26] 朱海斌, 杨林旭, 孟嘉赓, 等. 生物蛋白API对断奶仔猪生长性能、养分表观消化率和粪便微生物群落的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2026, 38(7): 4955-4966. ZHU H B, YANG L X, MENG J G, et al. Effects of biological protein API on growth performance, nutrient apparent digestibility and fecal microbiota of weaned piglets[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2026, 38(7): 4955-4966. [27] 孙铁虎, 卢宗梅, 陈博, 等. 日粮中添加发酵饲料对育肥猪养分消化率及肠道菌群的影响[J]. 中国饲料, 2021(1): 127-130. SUN T H, LU Z M, CHEN B, et al. Effects of different fermented feeds on nutrient digestibility and gut microflora of finishing pigs[J]. China Feed, 2021(1): 127-130. [28] HAAS B, GRENIER D. Understanding the virulence of Streptococcus suis: a veterinary, medical, and economic challenge[J]. Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses, 2018, 48(3): 159-166. [29] ZHANG S F, LUO CZ, LI K, et al. Baicalin alleviates intestinal inflammation and microbial disturbances by regulating Th17/Treg balance and enhancing Lactobacillus colonization in piglets[J]. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2024, 15(1): 172. [30] DANG G Q, WANG W X, ZHONG R Q, et al. Pectin supplement alleviates gut injury potentially through improving gut microbiota community in piglets[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2022, 13: 1069694.
[1] 刘言, 李彬, 魏堂鸿, 周思诗, 李镇江, 刘韵涵, 罗何峰, 车炼强. 人工乳在哺乳仔猪生产中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(5): 58-69.
[2] 李筱雯, 胡修忠, 黄俊程, 刘爽, 李钢平, 徐瑞瑞. 发酵棕榈粕替代部分豆粕对育肥猪生长性能、血清指标及屠宰性能的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(5): 70-79.
[3] 万荣, 农斯伟, 邹智淼, 黄威, 万昌乾, 甘启富, 杨明, 王赟, 黄剑, 陈江淮. 饲粮中添加发酵桑叶对断奶仔猪生长性能、腹泻及肠道微生态的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(4): 112-121.
[4] 吴鹏, 黄兴国, 蒋文欣, 李华丽, 胡雄贵, 任慧波, 刘莹莹. 发酵苜蓿在猪生产中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(4): 122-134.
[5] 赵书浩, 胡伟, 唐超, 麦子龙, 陈梓韬, 黎世彬, 乐亦光, 唐中林, 褚瑰燕. 不同杂交模式下的杜洛克猪×广东小耳花猪母猪繁殖性能及其后代早期生长性能分析[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(3): 36-42.
[6] 刘雅倩, 李宁, 郑梓, 等. 茯苓多糖对育肥猪生长性能、饲料养分消化率、血常规及免疫应答的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(1): 29-39.
[7] 龙红荣, 曹小键, 袁坤, 张承华, 汤建平. 复合益生菌发酵菌液对猪生长性能和猪舍内氨气浓度的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(5): 33-39.
[8] 张家庆, 王献伟, 刘赛安, 吕玲燕. 姜黄素对育肥猪生长性能、养分消化率和粪便微生物数量的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(4): 24-30.
[9] 梁龙华, 周明旭, 覃国喜, 何日靖, 黄小洁, 黄小惠. 应用育肥效率指数综合评价育肥猪饲养管理效果的实践研究[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(3): 89-97.
[10] 张汉宁, 兰干球, 梁晶. 饲料中添加地黄多糖对母猪繁殖性能和育肥猪生长性能的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(2): 93-100.
[11] 孙永刚, 张天阳, 杨月春, 岳雷, 房峻松, 于涛, 苏东雪. 丹法杂交与法法杂交二元母猪生长性能比较[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(6): 42-49.
[12] 吴买生,李玉莲,谭红,吴小琳,刘冬明,何炯斌. 植物甾醇在养猪生产中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(6): 60-65.
[13] 段玖均, 刘金阳, 王在贵, 张顺芬, 张立兰, 王阳, 陈亮, 钟儒清. 非淀粉多糖酶组合对苏淮猪生长性能和肌肉风味氨基酸含量的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(2): 15-23.
[14] 李雨菁,郝瑞荣. 葡萄籽原花青素对不同生长阶段猪生长性能的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(1): 19-24.
[15] 赵勤辉,许婷婷,刘家,汤海鸥. 复合营养性膏剂对新生仔猪生长性能的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(1): 25-31.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!