应用育肥效率指数综合评价育肥猪饲养管理效果的实践研究

doi:10.16174/j.issn.1673-4645.2025.03.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 育肥效率指数（FSA）通过综合考量日增重、料肉比和饲养时间，可以更准确地反映饲养管理综合效果。本研究探讨FSA 在育肥猪饲养管理效果评价中的应用，旨在为养猪企业在生产管理效率、经济效益提升及行业整体发展等方面带来积极影响。试验选择2023要2024 年育肥猪场所有批次数据进行统计分析，结果表明：FSA与日增重、成活率、料重比呈现强相关性，与药苗成本、饲料增重成本、育肥增重成本等均呈现负相关关系；应用FSA期间，育肥猪成活率SVL、日增重ADG均呈季度上升趋势，料重比、成本指标持续下降。通过综合分析推荐采用FSA考核的目标定为FSA≥250。

关键词: 育肥猪, 育肥效率指数, 饲养管理, 生猪养殖, 成本控制, 经济效益

Abstract:

The fattening efficiency index (FSA) comprehensively took into account daily weight gain, feed conversion ratio, and feeding time, and could more accurately reflect the overall effect of feeding management. This study explored the application of FSA in evaluating the feeding management effect of fattening pigs, aimed to bring positive impacts to pig farming enterprises in terms of production management efficiency, economic benefits improvement, and overall industry development. All batch data of fattening pig farms from 2023 to 2024 were selected for statistical analysis. The results showed that: FSA had a strong correlation with daily weight gain, survival rate, and feed conversion ratio, and a negative correlation with costs such as medicine and vaccine costs, feed costs per unit weight gain, and fattening costs per unit weight gain; during the application of FSA, the survival rate (SVL) and average daily gain (ADG) of fattening pigs showed a quarterly upward trend, while the feed conversion ratio and cost indicators continued to decline. Through comprehensive analysis, it was recommended to set the goal of FSA assessment as FSA≥250.

Key words: fattening pigs')">

fattening pigs, fattening efficiency index, breeding management, swine production, cost control, economic benefits

中图分类号: S828；S816

梁龙华, 周明旭, 覃国喜, 何日靖, 黄小洁, 黄小惠. 应用育肥效率指数综合评价育肥猪饲养管理效果的实践研究[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(3): 89-97.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	张汉宁，兰干球，梁晶. 饲料中添加地黄多糖对母猪繁殖性能和育肥猪生长性能的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(2): 93-100.
[2]	杨馨雨, 车炼强, 陈代文, 伍爱民. 铁营养与仔猪腹泻[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(1): 3-11.
[3]	吴买生，李玉莲，谭红，吴小琳，刘冬明，何炯斌. 植物甾醇在养猪生产中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(6): 60-65.
[4]	岳健民, 朱君, 刘胤池, 赵宇亮, 贾楠, 陈超, 李斌. 猪舍智能作业机器人导航技术研究进展[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(3): 15-23.
[5]	刘洋，乌云花. 不同规模生猪养殖成本收益分析——以山东省为例[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(2): 82-94.
[6]	李雨菁，郝瑞荣. 葡萄籽原花青素对不同生长阶段猪生长性能的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(1): 19-24.
[7]	鲍艳珍. 我国大规模生猪养殖全要素生产率的时空差异——基于Malmquist指数和超效率SBM模型[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(1): 95-101.
[8]	于行峰. 环境约束下桂林市生猪养殖业发展思考[J]. 中国猪业, 2023, 18(6): 23-30.
[9]	李玉莲，何炯斌，谭红，刘伟，李朝晖，董杏林. 植物甾醇饲喂育肥猪效果研究及经济效益分析[J]. 中国猪业, 2023, 18(6): 46-49,52.
[10]	刘嫄，朱在明，刘繁华，葛玉双，郑鹏，张治斌. 木聚糖酶对育肥猪养分表观消化率的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2023, 18(6): 57-59.
[11]	周艳红. 浅谈中小养殖场生物安全管理[J]. 中国猪业, 2023, 18(6): 121-124.
[12]	姚华清. 两种种养结合模式猪粪污施肥试验报告[J]. 中国猪业, 2023, 18(6): 161-165.
[13]	王梦圆, 陶红军. 我国生猪期货发展现状、机遇及挑战[J]. 中国猪业, 2023, 18(5): 17-20,25.
[14]	梁耿, 谭德强. 发酵桑叶对育肥猪生长性能的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2023, 18(5): 48-51.
[15]	詹琼雷，李宾，唐学文，肖红亮. 湖南省地方猪与外三元猪养殖收益成本的比较分析[J]. 中国猪业, 2023, 18(4): 26-30，34.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed