中国猪业 ›› 2026, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (5): 11-22.doi: 10.16174/j.issn.1673-4645.2026.05.002

• 遗传繁殖 • 上一篇    下一篇

猪每窝死胎数的分布感知模型比较

陈绪,凌昕,朱清,张充,刘小红*   

  1. 有害生物控制与资源利用国家重点实验室/中山大学生命科学学院,广东广州510275
  • 出版日期:2026-11-13 发布日期:2026-10-25
  • 作者简介:作者简介:陈绪 (1996-),男,博士,研究方向为动物遗传育种与生物统计

Comparison of distribution-aware models for stillborn piglet counts per litter in pigs

CHEN Xu, LING Xin, ZHU Qing, ZHANG Chong, LIU Xiaohong*   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
  • Online:2026-11-13 Published:2026-10-25

摘要: 猪每窝死胎数为低均值计数数据,可存在过度离散与零膨胀,分布假设误设会导致估计偏倚。本研究旨在比较不同计数分布模型对每窝死胎数的适用性。以每窝死胎数为目标性状,构建蒙特卡罗模拟(设置4种真实生成机制),对6种模型进行极大似然拟合。通过信息准则、交叉验证预测似然及收敛率等指标评价,并在丹麦公开数据与本场54万余条分娩记录上进行验证。模型选择呈“机制匹配”格局:ZINB与Hurdle-NB在无过度离散时均未收敛。2套真实数据均呈明显过度离散与零膨胀,但最优模型并不完全一致:丹麦公开数据中ZINB的AIC与交叉验证预测对数似然最优,而本场大规模数据中Hurdle-NB的上述两项指标最优;在按窝赔付合同的公平定价测算中,Hurdle-NB偏差仅1.5%,而Poisson模型低估达61.0%。推荐以负二项(NB)模型为基准、ZINB/Hurdle-NB为首选候选的分布感知选择策略;简单Poisson模型不宜直接用于每窝死胎数分析。

关键词: 猪, 死胎数, 零膨胀模型, 负二项模型, 蒙特卡罗模拟

Abstract: The number of stillborn piglets per litter is a low-mean count trait that may exhibit overdispersion and zero inflation, and misspecification of the distributional assumption can lead to biased inference. This study systematically compared the applicability of six count models for this trait. Taking the number of stillborn piglets per litter as the target trait, a Monte Carlo simulation framework was built with four true data-generating mechanisms. Six models were fitted by maximum likelihood and evaluated using information criteria, cross-validated predictive likelihood, and convergence rates. The models were validated on public Danish farrowing records and more than 540,000 records from our farm. Model selection showed a clear mechanism-matching pattern: ZINB and Hurdle-NB failed to converge when overdispersion was absent. Both real datasets exhibited pronounced overdispersion and zero-inflation, but the best-performing model differed between datasets: ZINB had the best AIC and cross-validated predictive log-likelihood for the Danish data, whereas Hurdle-NB performed best on these two criteria for the farm data. For the fair pricing of a per-litter excess-loss compensation contract, Hurdle-NB deviated from the actual payout by only 1.5%, whereas Poisson underpriced the contract by 61.0%. NB is recommended as a robust baseline, and ZINB/Hurdle-NB as primary candidate models, with a distribution-aware selection strategy; the simple Poisson model should not be applied directly to stillborn piglet counts per litter.

Key words: pig, number of stillborn, zero-inflated model, negative binomial model, Monte Carlo simulation

中图分类号:  S828;S814

[1] ROTHSCHILD M F, BIDANEL J P. Biology and genetics of reproduction[M]//The Genetics of the Pig. Wallingford: CAB International, 1998: 313-343. [2] CANARIO L,CANTONI E,LE BIHAN E, et al. Between-breed variability of stillbirth and its relationship with sow and piglet characteristics[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2006, 84(12): 3185-3196. [3] JU M M,WANG X N,LI X J, et al. Effects of litter size and parity on farrowing duration of Landrace × Yorkshire sows[J]. Animals, 2021, 12(1): 94. [4] VARONA L,SORENSEN D. A genetic analysis of mortality in pigs[J]. Genetics, 2010, 184(1): 277-284. [5] VAN DEN BOSCH M,VAN DE LINDE I B,KEMP B, et al. Disentangling litter size and farrowing duration effects on piglet stillbirth, acid-base blood parameters and pre-weaning mortality[J]. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2022, 9: 836202. [6] CAMERON A C,TRIVEDI P K. Regression Analysis of Count Data[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013. [7] MRODE R A. Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding values[M]. UK: CABI, 2014. [8] MRODE R A. Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing[J]. Technometrics, 1992, 34(1): 1-14. [9] MULLAHY J. Specification and testing of some modified count data models[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1986, 33(3): 341-365. [10] ZEILEIS A,KLEIBER C,JACKMAN S. Regression models for count data in R[J]. Journal of Statistical Software, 2008, 27(8): 1-25. [11] HILBE J M. Negative Binomial Regression[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011. [12] CHO H,LIU C,PREISSER J S, et al. A bivariate zero-inflated negative binomial model and its applications to biomedical settings[J]. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 2023, 32(7): 1300-1317. [13] CHOUDHARY S,SATIJA R. Comparison and evaluation of statistical error models for scRNA-seq[J]. Genome Biology, 2022, 23(1): 27. [14] FENG C X. A comparison of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling zero-inflated count data[J]. Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, 2021, 8(1): 8. [15] CHRISTENSEN J,,SVENSMARK B. Evaluation of producer-recorded causes of preweaning mortality in Danish sow herds[J]. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 1997, 32(3/4): 155-164. [16] DOHOO I,MARTIN W,STRYHN H. Veterinary epidemiologic research[M]. 2nd ed. Charlottetown: VER Inc., 2010.
[1] 林坚, 陈馨玥, 冯越, 徐忠, 顾以韧. 基于GWAS挖掘大白猪初生重和乳头数的候选基因[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(5): 3-10.
[2] 刘聪, 付张娜, 和艺云, 吴潇潇, 梁爽, 张艳萍, 梁晶. 巴马香猪FGF2基因克隆、生物信息学分析和组织表达研究[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(5): 23-32.
[3] 武群清, 张跃博, 唐湘薇. 湖南5个地方猪品种线粒体全基因组序列特征与系统发育分析[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(5): 33-40.
[4] 楚菡, 邓诗凡, 楚蕊鸽, 吕志东, 马嘉宁, 于春梅, 曹靖轩, 李文军, 蒲蕾. Hsp70通过cAMP/PKA信号通路抑制猪肌内前体脂肪细胞成脂分化的研究[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(5): 41-48.
[5] 赵志林, 盛英霞, 姜雪芹, 曲玉功, 王振, 张依裕. 柯乐猪PTN基因第1内含子SNPs对繁殖性状的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(5): 49-57.
[6] 刘言, 李彬, 魏堂鸿, 周思诗, 李镇江, 刘韵涵, 罗何峰, 车炼强. 人工乳在哺乳仔猪生产中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(5): 58-69.
[7] 李筱雯, 胡修忠, 黄俊程, 刘爽, 李钢平, 徐瑞瑞. 发酵棕榈粕替代部分豆粕对育肥猪生长性能、血清指标及屠宰性能的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(5): 70-79.
[8] 汪审岳, 李凯, 吴盈盈, 史凯, 周潇, 戴久丽, 陈淑芳, 秦宏钿. 发酵竹粉对育肥猪生长性能、养分表观消化率等方面的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(5): 80-91.
[9] 卞正容, 程传民, 蒋鑫, 陈飞, 丁小荞. 猪配合饲料中铅、镉、铬、砷含量的调查研究[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(5): 92-97.
[10] 吴国林, 洪阳, 邵丽晓, 姜平, 白娟. 规模化种猪场伪狂犬病病毒阴性维持策略及效果评估[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(5): 98-106.
[11] 杨彦, 李强, 王鹤然. 种养结合模式下规模化生猪养殖碳足迹核算与减排效果分析——基于生命周期评价(LCA)方法[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(5): 107-117.
[12] 童宇, 刘承汉, 蒋海华, 吴芮庭, 王玲丽, 钟儒清, 刘向东. 楼房猪场饲料输送排程减少顶料损失与电耗的应用[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(4): 11-16.
[13] 孙文萱, 姜波, 王文文. 智慧养猪中自动料线与饲喂站的应用现状及优化路径[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(4): 17-25.
[14] 甘悦宁, 刘辉, 蒋海华, 刘承汉, 吴芮庭, 王玲丽, 钟儒清, 王燕, 赵云翔, 刘向东. 智能精准饲喂系统对楼房猪场母猪繁殖性能的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(4): 26-36.
[15] 雷云峰, 龚建军, 朱淋, 李晋川, 杨雪梅, 梁艳, 杨坤, 杨跃奎, 杜龙环, 何志平, 陶璇. 后备猪舍靶向通风系统应用效果研究[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(4): 37-47.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!