中国猪业 ›› 2025, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3): 98-105.doi: 10.16174/j.issn.1673-4645.2025.03.010

• 养殖管理 • 上一篇    

猪群热应激评价方法的研究进展

庞超,赵宪锐,姜洪旭,李修松,郑炜超,葛绍娟,王聪颖,沈盼   

  • 出版日期:2025-06-25 发布日期:2025-06-25

  • Online:2025-06-25 Published:2025-06-25

摘要: 猪群热应激严重影响养猪生产,降低生产性能、增加成本并威胁动物健康。准确评估猪群热应激水平对缓解热应激、提高养猪效益意义重大。本文综合多篇文献,对猪群热应激的危害、热应激的评价指标以及环境热应激评价系统进行了总结和分析。阐述了热应激对猪群生理功能、行为、免疫功能及生产性能的影响;介绍了猪群行为、生理及血液指标等热应激的评价指标;总结了应用较广的环境热应激评价模型的评估方式,如温湿指数(THI)、有效环境温度(EET)等。详细探讨了不同热环境评价系统的优势、局限性和改进方向,并指出Bjerg 的有效环境温度评价模型能够比较全面的评估猪舍的环境热量水平,更加适合猪场对环境条件的快速评价。本文旨在为优化猪舍环境、推动养猪业可持续发展提供参考,同时指出未来应综合更多因素优化现有评价体系,开发更精准便捷的猪群热应激评价模型。

关键词: 猪;猪场;热应激;评价指标;环境热应激;评价系统;有效环境温度

Abstract: The heat stress of pig herds seriously affected pig production, reduced production performance, increased costs and threatened animal health. Accurately evaluating the heat stress level of pig herds were great significance for alleviating heat stress and improving pig breeding benefits. This paper comprehensively summarized and analyzed the hazards of heat stress in pig herds, the evaluation indicators of heat stress, and the environmental heat stress evaluation system based on multiple literatures. It expounded the impact and causes of heat stress on the physiological functions, behavior, immune function and production performance of pig herds; introduced the evaluation indicators of heat stress such as behavioral, physiological and blood indicators of pigs; and summarized the evaluation methods of widely used environmental heat stress evaluation models, such as the Temperature-Humidity Index (THI), Effective Environmental Temperature (EET), etc. The advantages, limitations and improvement directions of different thermal environment evaluation systems were discussed in detail, and it was pointed out that Bjerg's effective environmental temperature evaluation model could more comprehensively evaluate the heat stress level in pig houses and was more suitable for the rapid evaluation of environmental conditions in pig farms. This paper aimed to provide a reference for optimizing the pig house environment and promoting the sustainable development of the pig industry, and at the same time pointed out that in the future, more factors should be comprehensively considered to optimize the existing evaluation system and develop more accurate and convenient evaluation models.

Key words: pig; rehmannia polysaccharides; sows; fattening pigs; reproductive performance; growth performance; plant extracts; feed additive

中图分类号:  S828;S852

[1] 项维,吴利军,何斌,张付贤. 猪细菌性病原耐药性研究进展[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(3): 63-79.
[2] 闫才杰,王聪,刘纪玉,段连茂,朱光山,孙少辉,王紫荷,万进,马妮妮,戴银娣,胡娟,王天硕,韩峰,罗刚,张振东. 猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒1型和2型毒株ORF6双重qPCR检测方法的构建[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(3): 80-88.
[3] 覃珍珍,王志远,文波,潘红丽,凌洪,郑蓉,吴先华. 我国猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒ORF5基因变异及全基因组重组分析[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(6): 66-75.
[4] 张人俊,彭启凤,潘 鸿,张 毅,沈朝建,刘 平. 非洲猪瘟分子生物学和免疫学检测技术研究进展[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(4): 25-36.
[5] 邓 毅,漆信桥,张继甫,张 勋,周娜娜,徐志文,刘天强. 养猪场烟雾消毒机消毒效果评价[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(4): 37-43.
[6] 刘德清,李知夏,曾 香,罗 伟,罗婷婷,徐春雨,农丽洁,梁龙华,米树运,覃国喜. 规模猪场口蹄疫灭活疫苗免疫抗体评估[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(4): 44-49.
[7] 李金海,李兴玉. 我国猪蓝耳病NADC34-like毒株的流行病学及致病性研究进展[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(2): 59-66.
[8] 阳红莲,何玉华,朱玲,徐志文. 藏香猪流行性腹泻病毒的PCR检测及毒株分型[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(2): 67-73.
[9] 王传锋 米青婕 皮志媛. 新疆伊犁河谷地区规模化猪场病毒性腹泻疾病检测与分析[J]. 中国猪业, 2022, 17(2): 70-73.
[10] 饶丹. 2019 年河南新乡某规模化猪场 猪伪狂犬病抗体水平检测分析[J]. 中国猪业, 2022, 17(2): 74-76.
[11] 陈淑芳 戴久丽 贾惠言 宋佳巍 李玲 罗锦标 姚旭 冯景松 吴盈盈 姜俊保 娄浙赟. 浙江宁波地区近10 年猪弓形虫病的调查及防治建议[J]. 中国猪业, 2022, 17(2): 77-80,85.
[12] 周婷婷 刘帅. 猪圆环病毒核酸检测技术研究进展[J]. 中国猪业, 2022, 17(2): 81-85.
[13] 付玉亮. 非洲猪瘟病毒的不同病原学检测方法比较[J]. 中国猪业, 2022, 17(2): 95-98.
[14] 王紫阳, 谢静, 欧亚妮, 邱国斌, 屈勇刚, 党瑞莹, 高嘉豪. 2019—2020年新疆部分地区猪PCV2的抗体水平检测及分析[J]. 中国猪业, 2021, 16(6): 67-70.
[15] 宁慧波, 周洋, 王华龙. 猪口蹄疫疫苗临床免疫效果评估[J]. 中国猪业, 2021, 16(6): 79-81.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!