中国猪业 ›› 2026, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3): 36-42.doi: 10.16174/j.issn.1673-4645.2026.03.004

• 专题报道 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同杂交模式下的杜洛克猪×广东小耳花猪母猪繁殖性能及其后代早期生长性能分析

赵书浩,胡伟,唐超,麦子龙,陈梓韬,黎世彬,乐亦光,唐中林,褚瑰燕   

  1. 1西北农林科技大学动物科技学院,陕西杨凌 712100; 2中国农业科学院(深圳)农业基因组研究所,广东深圳518000; 3佛山鲲鹏现代农业研究院,广东佛山 528225; 4佛山市三水区乐家庄养殖有限公司,广东佛山 528100
  • 出版日期:2026-07-15 发布日期:2026-06-25

  • Online:2026-07-15 Published:2026-06-25

摘要: 为比较杜洛克×广东小耳花猪(DH)二元母猪在回交和横交模式下的繁殖性能及其后代早期生长性能差异,选取健康、体重相近的DH母猪作为母本,分别以杜洛克公猪和DH公猪作为父本进行回交和横交产生DDH(25%广东小耳花猪血缘)和DHDH(50%广东小耳花猪血缘)猪。在相同营养水平和饲养管理条件下,测定DH母猪繁殖性能及DDH与DHDH早期生长性能。结果表明:DDH组母猪在总产仔数(11.67头)和产活仔数(11.39头)方面具有明显优势,显著高于DHDH组的10.43头和10.36头(P<0.01和P<0.05),且初生窝重(13.90 kg)、30日龄断奶窝重(69.56 kg)均极显著高于DHDH组的9.87 kg和54.54 kg(P<0.01);但DHDH组弱仔比例(0.29头)、断奶成活率(93%)极显著优于DDH组(0.81头、86%,P<0.01)。DDH初生重(1.33 kg)、30日龄断奶重(7.03 kg)等早期生长性状指标极显著高于DHDH(1.03 kg,6.01 kg,P<0.01),校正达30 kg日龄(104.06 d)显著低于DHDH(106.59 d,P<0.05)。早期生长阶段(6~30 kg)平均日增重差异不显著(P>0.05)。性状相关分析显示:总产仔数与产活仔数呈极显著正相关(P<0.001,r=0.92),二者与初生窝重、断奶成活数、30日龄断奶窝重均呈极显著或显著正相关;同时弱仔数与两者亦呈极显著正相关(P<0.001,r=0.67、0.65);但总产仔数、产活仔数与初生重、30日龄断奶重、早期日增重无显著相关性。初生窝重、30日龄断奶重及30日龄断奶窝重均与初生重呈极显著正相关(P<0.001,r=0.63、0.52、0.32)。综上,在广东小耳花猪杂交利用中,DDH杂交组合在产仔数、初生重、30日龄断奶(窝)重、校正达30 kg日龄等生产性能上更具优势,但需加强母猪及仔猪的饲养管理,此外还需综合毛色及肌肉品质表现,以达到生产效率与效益最大化。

关键词: 广东小耳花猪, 杜洛克猪, 杂交, DH母猪, 繁殖性能, 早期生长性能

Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare the reproductive performance and the early growth performance differences of the binary sows of Duroc ×Guangdong small-ear spotted pig (DH) under two different hybridization modes, namely backcrossing and crossbreeding. It was to provide a reference for the efficient hybrid utilization of Guangdong small-ear spotted pig. Healthy and weight-matched DH sows were selected as the maternal parent. DH sows were crossed with either Duroc boars or DH boars to produce two descendant groups: Duroc×(Duroc×Guangdong small-ear spotted pig) (DDH, 25% Guangdong small-ear spotted pig bloodline) and (Duroc ×Guangdong small-ear spotted pig) ×(Duroc ×Guangdong small-ear spotted pig) (DHDH, 50% Guangdong small-ear spotted pig bloodline). Under the same feed nutrition level and management conditions, the reproductive performance of DH sows and the early growth performance of DDH and DHDH were statistically analyzed. The results showed that the sows in the DDH group had significant advantages in total number born litter size (TNB, 11.67 piglets) and number born alive (NBA, 11.39 piglets), which were significantly higher than those in the DHDH group (10.43 piglets, 10.36 piglets, P<0.01 or P<0.05), and litter weight at birth (13.90 kg) and weaning weight of litter at 30 d (69.56 kg) were significantly higher than those in the DHDH group (9.87 kg, 54.54 kg, P<0.01); however, compared with the DHDH group, the proportion of weak piglets in the DDH group was extremely significantly increased (0.81 piglets, P<0.01), and the weaning survival rate (86%) was extremely significantly decreased (P<0.01). The early growth traits indicators such as birth weight (1.33 kg), weaning weight at 30 d (7.03 kg) of DDH were extremely significantly higher than DHDH (1.03 kg, 6.01 kg, P<0.01), the days to 30 kg body weight (104.06 d) was significantly shorter than that of DHDH (106.59 d, P<0.05). The average daily gain during the early growth stage (6~30 kg) showed no significant difference (P>0.05). In terms of trait correlations, TNB and NBA were extremely significantly positively correlated (P<0.001, r=0.92), and both were extremely significantly or significantly positively correlated with litter weight at birth , weaning live number, and weaning weight of litter at 30 d; at the same time, they were extremely significantly positively correlated with the number of weak piglets (P<0.001, r=0.67, 0.65); however, TNB, NBA were not significantly correlated with birth weight, weaning weight at 30 d, and average daily gain during the early growth stage. Litter weight at birth, weaning weight at 30 d, and weaning weight of litter at 30 d were all extremely significantly positively correlated with birth weight (P<0.001, r=0.63, 0.52, 0.32). The results of this study indicated that in the practice of hybrid utilization of Guangdong small-ear spotted pig, the DDH combination had more advantages in production efficiency, such as litter size, birth weight, weaning (litter) weight and the corrected weight at 30 kg of age, but it was necessary to strengthen the feeding and management of sows and piglets. In addition, it was also necessary to comprehensively consider the coat color and muscle quality to achieve the maximum production efficiency and benefits.

Key words: Guangdong small-ear spotted pig, Duroc, hybridization, DH sow, reproductive performance, early growth performance

中图分类号:  S828;S813.22

[1] 王林云, 赵清波, 杜陶然. 我国地方猪种保种技术路线探讨[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(3): 4-6.
[2] 孙立军, 曹宇豪, 牛佳琦, 等. 内江猪、大白猪及其杂交公猪睾丸发育和精液质量差异分析[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(3): 43-51.
[3] 邝伟键, 李玉林, 胡 斌, 袁 坤, 何艺平, 曹小键, 梁祥解. 楼房猪场法系母猪一胎生产参数对二胎繁殖性能的影响研究[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(6): 40-49.
[4] 李玉莲, 谭红, 吴买生. 湘沙猪配套系繁殖性能测定分析[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(3): 16-22.
[5] 徐桢,贺媛媛,刘凯,曹亚鸽,李莉,卫恒习,张守全. 烯丙孕素处理对初产母猪繁殖性能的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(2): 75-83.
[6] 李洪,戴琦,熊汉成,吴丽艳. 不同有效精子数的自动仿生输精技术对母猪繁殖性能的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(2): 84-92.
[7] 张汉宁, 兰干球, 梁晶. 饲料中添加地黄多糖对母猪繁殖性能和育肥猪生长性能的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(2): 93-100.
[8] 杜玉诗, 郭建凤, 王为全. 烟台黑猪和长烟杂交猪繁殖性能及育肥产肉性能比较[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(1): 55-62.
[9] 孙永刚, 张天阳, 杨月春, 岳雷, 房峻松, 于涛, 苏东雪. 丹法杂交与法法杂交二元母猪生长性能比较[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(6): 42-49.
[10] 许建春,吴先华,潘红丽,凌 洪,金宣讲,卓 清,苏 胖,李 宇. 不同厂商烯丙孕素对后备母猪同期发情以及繁殖性能影响的研究[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(4): 19-24.
[11] 周光亮,许源峰,杨慧,李新云,赵云翔,刘向东. 全产业链猪育种体系构建的研究进展[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(3): 59-67.
[12] 卢晓芳,冉茂良. 胎次和配种季节对二元母猪繁殖性能的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(3): 85-92.
[13] 蔡东森,徐伟风,陈海军,周小钰,李开军,伍冠锁. 杂交山猪饲料中添加甜菜碱和半胱胺分别对背膘厚和血清生化指标的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2023, 18(6): 63-66.
[14] 杨瑢. 2023年前三季度猪肉市场分析及展望[J]. 中国猪业, 2023, 18(5): 30-33.
[15] 刘梅. 不同水平纳米硒对母猪繁殖性能及仔猪生长性能的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2023, 18(5): 40-43.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!