中国猪业 ›› 2026, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4): 48-56.doi: 10.16174/j.issn.1673-4645.2026.04.008

• 专题报道 • 上一篇    下一篇

楼房养猪模式下楼层对育肥猪舍内空气质量的影响

桂楚宸1,吴芮庭2,王燕1,邓近平1,张玲娜1*,刘向东2,3*   

  1. 1华南农业大学动物科学学院,广东广州510642 

    2广西扬翔集团股份有限公司,广西贵港537100 

    3华中农业大学,湖北武汉430070

  • 出版日期:2026-08-25 发布日期:2026-08-25
  • 作者简介:作者简介:桂楚宸(2002-),男,广西柳州人,硕士研究生,主要从事动物行为和福利方面的研究,E-mail:2098653660@qq.com 通信作者:张玲娜(1990-),女,江苏泰州人,副教授,主要从事动物行为和福利方面的研究,E-mail:Lingna.zhang@scau.edu.cn; 刘向东(1983-),男,博士,副教授,研究方向为智慧养猪技术与楼房养猪模式的创新与应用,E-mail:liuxiangdong@mail.hzau.edu.cn

Effects of different floors on indoor air quality in finishing pig barns of multi-story pig farms

GUI Chuchen1, WU Ruiting2, WANG Yan1, DENG Jinping1, ZHANG Lingna1*, LIU Xiangdong2,3*   

  1. 1College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; 

    2Guangxi Yangxiang Group Co.,Ltd., Guigang 537100, China; 

    3Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

  • Online:2026-08-25 Published:2026-08-25

摘要: 在封闭式楼房养猪模式下,舍内环境直接影响猪只健康生产和动物福利。本文调研了1天内部分连续时间监测下楼层差异对育肥猪舍内环境条件变化的影响。针对常见指标二氧化碳、氨气和温湿度于下午3:30时到第二天早晨7:30时,这一时间段内在高、中、低楼层的育肥舍中进行每分钟级的连续监控。结果显示,空气温度呈现低楼层高于高楼层高于中楼层的规律,这可能与中楼层猪只数量最低以及楼层高度有关。高楼层湿度高于中低楼层,可能受顶层废气处理用水帘的影响。二氧化碳浓度随时间推移而下降,氨气浓度也遵循相似规律,但楼层间存在差异。二氧化碳和氨气整体呈现低楼层浓度高于高楼层的趋势,推测也与顶层通风设计有关。夜间猪只活动量降低,对环境的影响较小,可能更适合进行如外环境影响舍内环境数据随时空变化方面的研究。本研究摸索了育肥猪舍内环境参数的时空变化规律,为楼房猪场舍内精细化环境控制提供了参考。

关键词: 楼房猪场, 环境, 温度, 湿度, 二氧化碳, 氨气

Abstract: Under the fully enclosed multi-story pig raising mode, the indoor barn environment directly affects pig health, production performance and animal welfare. This study explored the effects of floor differences on diurnal variations of environmental conditions in finishing pig barns via continuous long-term monitoring throughout a whole day. Four common indicators, namely carbon dioxide (CO2), ammonia (NH3), air temperature and relative humidity, were continuously monitored at 1-minute intervals in finishing barns on the bottom, middle and top floors, with the monitoring period covering from 15:30 to 07:30 the next morning. The results showed that the air temperature followed the sequence: bottom floor > top floor > middle floor. This phenomenon was probably related to the smaller number of pigs raised on the middle floor as well as differences in floor height. The relative humidity on the top floor was higher than that on the middle and bottom floors, which may be caused by the water curtain used for waste gas treatment on the top floor. Carbon dioxide concentration decreased as time elapsed, and ammonia concentration exhibited a similar declining trend, while discrepancies existed among different floors. Overall, concentrations of both CO2 and NH3 were higher on the bottom floor than on the top floor, which was speculated to be associated with the ventilation design of the top floor. Pigs have lower activity levels at night and impose less interference on the barn micro-environment; therefore, nighttime is more suitable for research concerning spatiotemporal variations of environmental data. This study clarified the spatiotemporal change patterns of environmental parameters in finishing pig barns, and provides a reference for precise environmental regulation in multi-story pig farms.

Key words: multi-story pig farm, environment, temperature, relative humidity, carbon dioxide, ammonia

中图分类号:  S828;S815

[1] 鄢朝辉, 王明利, 高远飞. 多层养猪与平层养猪的经济效益对比研究[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2026, 62(5): 65-68. YAN Z H, WANG M L, GAO Y F. Comparative study on economic benefits of multi-layer pig raising and flat-layer pig raising[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2026, 62(5): 65-68. [2] 李丹, 刘向东, 王明利, 等. 多层(楼房)养猪典型模式梳理与对比分析[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2026, 62(5): 58-64. LI D, LIU X D, WANG M L, et al. Combing and comparative analysis of typical pig-raising modes in multi-storey buildings[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2026, 62(5): 58-64. [3] 郭绪坤. 楼房养猪与平房养猪碳排放的比较与规律研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2024. GUO X K. Comparison and regularity of carbon emissions of pig raising in buildings and bungalows[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2024. [4] XIE Q J, NI J Q, BAO J, et al. Correlations, variations, and modelling of indoor environment in a mechanically-ventilated pig building[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 282: 124441. [5] NI J Q, ERASMUS M A, CRONEY C C, et al. A critical review of advancement in scientific research on food animal welfare-related air pollution[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 408: 124468. [6] ZHOU Y, ZHANG M H, FENG J H, et al. Effect of relative humidity at chronic temperature on growth performance, glucose consumption, and mitochondrial ATP production of broilers[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18(6): 1321-1328. [7] HUYNH T T, AARNINK A J, VERSTEGEN M W, et al. Effects of increasing temperatures on physiological changes in pigs at different relative humidities[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2005, 83(6): 1385-1396. [8] MURPHY T, CARGILL C, RUTLEY D, et al. Pig-shed air polluted by α-haemolytic cocci and ammonia causes subclinical disease and production losses[J]. Veterinary Record, 2012, 171(5): 123. [9] 罗晶晶, 王燕. 楼房猪场智能环境控制技术[J]. 猪业科学, 2024, 41(7): 33-35, 10. LUO J J, WANG Y. Intelligent environment control technology of building pig farm[J]. Swine Industry Science, 2024, 41(7): 33-35, 10. [10] 高航, 袁雄坤, 姜丽丽, 等. 猪舍环境参数研究综述[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(16): 3226-3236. GAO H, YUAN X K, JIANG L L, et al. Review of environmental parameters in pig house[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(16): 3226-3236. [11] SEO I H, LEE I B, MOON O K, et al. Modelling of internal environmental conditions in a full-scale commercial pig house containing animals[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2012, 111(1): 91-106. [12] OLIVEIRA J, YUS E, GUITIáN F J. Effects of management, environmental and temporal factors on mortality and feed consumption in integrated swine fattening farms[J]. Livestock Science, 2009, 123(2/3): 221-229. [13] SEO H J, OH B W, SEO I H. Environmental monitoring and thermal data analysis related to mortality rates in a commercial pig house[J]. Agriculture, 2025, 15(6): 635. [14] 钟志君, 洪亮, 刘进远, 等. 地道通风楼房猪舍冬季环境因子空间分布规律研究[J]. 畜牧与兽医, 2025, 57(2): 38-45. ZHONG Z J, HONG L, LIU J Y, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of environmental parameters in ground channel ventilated multistory pig buildings in winter[J]. Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2025, 57(2): 38-45. [15] 史凌杰, 郑炜超, 李修松, 等. 楼房式妊娠母猪舍靶向通风系统应用效果[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2023, 28(2): 217-226. SHI L J, ZHENG W C, LI X S, et al. Experimental study on the application effect of targeted ventilation in multi-floor farrowing sow house[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2023, 28(2): 217-226. [16] 高云, 刁亚萍, 林长光, 等. 机械通风楼房猪舍热环境及有害气体监测与分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(4): 239-247. GAO Y, DIAO Y P, LIN C G, et al. Monitoring and analysis of thermal environment and harmful gases in mechanically ventilated multistory pig buildings[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(4): 239-247. [17] 胡志儒, 杨奇志, 谭志军, 等. 规模化猪场降温系统研究综述[J]. 暖通空调, 2022, 52(8): 10-17. HU Z R, YANG Q Z, TAN Z J, et al. Research review on cooling systems in large-scale pig farms[J]. Heating Ventilating & Air Conditioning, 2022, 52(8): 10-17. [18] 严浩铭. 环境质量优化视角的十万头楼房育肥楼房猪场规划方案设计[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2024. YAN H M. Planning and design of a 100,000 head building fattening pig farm from the perspective of environmental quality optimization[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2024. [19] WANG X S, WU J G, YI Q Y, et al. Numerical evaluation on ventilation rates of a novel multi-floor pig building using computational fluid dynamics[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2021, 182: 106050. [20] 臧建军, 王军军. 猪健康高效养殖环境手册[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2021. ZANG J J, WANG J J. Manual for healthy and efficient pig farming environment[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Publishing House, 2021. [21] 严浩然, 桂楚宸, 刘向东, 等. 楼房猪场生长育肥舍环境因子的时空分布规律[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2026, 62(5): 44-50. YAN H R, GUI C C, LIU X D, et al. Temporal and spatial distribution of environmental factors in growing and fattening houses in building pig farms[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2026, 62(5): 44-50. [22] XIN Y C, RONG L, SCHAUBERGER G, et al. Ammonia dispersion from multi-floor versus standard single-floor pig production facilities based on computational fluid dynamics simulations[J]. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2023, 10(3): 374-389. [23] BIGELOW J A, HOUPT T R. Feeding and drinking patterns in young pigs[J]. Physiology & Behavior, 1988, 43(1): 99-109. [24] DUBE?OVá M, ?IMA T, GáLIK R, et al. Reduction of nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide in the pig barn piggery by different ventilation system intensities[J]. Agronomy Research, 2014, 12(1): 207-214. [25] MADSEN T N, KRISTENSEN A R. A model for monitoring the condition of young pigs by their drinking behaviour[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2005, 48(2): 138-154. [26] 周丹, 刁亚萍, 高云, 等. 猪舍内CO2的排放研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(16): 3201-3213. ZHOU D, DIAO Y P, GAO Y, et al. Research review on CO2 production in pig house[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(16): 3201-3213. [27] 陈佶, 刘伟华, 魏建超. 猪舍非线性环境因素对猪生产性能影响的研究进展[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(1): 73-83. CHEN J, LIU W H, WEI J C. Research progress on the influence of nonlinear environmental factors in pigsty on pig production performance[J]. China Swine Industry, 2025, 20(1): 73-83. [28] VITALI M, SANTOLINI E, BOVO M, et al. Behavior and welfare of undocked heavy pigs raised in buildings with different ventilation systems[J]. Animals, 2021, 11(8): 2338. [29] 张祥. 饲养密度对猪群生产性能和健康的影响[J]. 北方牧业, 2024(9): 32. ZHANG X. Effect of feeding density on production performance and health of pigs[J]. Beifang Muye, 2024(9): 32. [30] 李永振, 王朝元, 黄仕伟, 等. 饲养密度和玩具对育肥猪生产性能、行为和生理指标的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(12): 191-198. LI Y Z, WANG C Y, HUANG S W, et al. Effects of stocking density and toy provision on production performance, behavior and physiological indexes of finishing pigs[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(12): 191-198. [31] 周凯, 刘春龙, 吴信. 集约化饲养条件下饲养密度对猪生长性能和健康影响的研究进展[J]. 动物营养学报, 2019, 31(1): 57-62. ZHOU K, LIU C L, WU X. Research progress of effects of stocking density on growth performance and health of pigs under intensive production model[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 31(1): 57-62. [32] RODRIGUEZ M R, LOSADA E, BESTEIRO R, et al. Evolution of NH3 concentrations in weaner pig buildings based on setpoint temperature[J]. Agronomy, 2020, 10(1): 107. [33] CHOI L Y, LEE S Y, JEONG H, et al. Ammonia and particulate matter emissions at a Korean commercial pig farm and influencing factors[J]. Animals, 2023, 13(21): 3347.
[1] 甘悦宁, 刘辉, 蒋海华, 刘承汉, 吴芮庭, 王玲丽, 钟儒清, 王燕, 赵云翔, 刘向东. 智能精准饲喂系统对楼房猪场母猪繁殖性能的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(4): 26-36.
[2] 雷云峰, 龚建军, 朱淋, 李晋川, 杨雪梅, 梁艳, 杨坤, 杨跃奎, 杜龙环, 何志平, 陶璇. 后备猪舍靶向通风系统应用效果研究[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(4): 37-47.
[3] 王静雯, 何浪, 周璇, 等. 非洲猪瘟背景下猪场物资高温消毒影响因素研究[J]. 中国猪业, 2026, 21(1): 56-65.
[4] 邝伟键, 李玉林, 胡 斌, 袁 坤, 何艺平, 曹小键, 梁祥解. 楼房猪场法系母猪一胎生产参数对二胎繁殖性能的影响研究[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(6): 40-49.
[5] 龙红荣, 曹小键, 袁坤, 张承华, 汤建平. 复合益生菌发酵菌液对猪生长性能和猪舍内氨气浓度的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(5): 33-39.
[6] 王力, 朱佳文, 李彬, 刘言, 苏志鹏. 生猪福利影响机制与改善措施的研究进展[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(5): 40-49.
[7] 邝伟键,李玉林,胡斌,袁坤,梁祥解. 楼房猪场中品种、胎次及季节对法系母猪繁殖性能的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(3): 23-31.
[8] 庞超,赵宪锐,姜洪旭,李修松,郑炜超,葛绍娟,王聪颖,沈盼. 猪群热应激评价方法的研究进展[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(3): 98-105.
[9] 陈 佶, 刘伟华, 魏建超. 猪舍非线性环境因素对猪生产性能影响的研究进展[J]. 中国猪业, 2025, 20(1): 73-83.
[10] 施睿佳, 顾宪红. 保育猪福利问题、异常行为及其改善措施调研报告[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(5): 33-42.
[11] 周昕, 冯钧哲, 徐杏, 谢传奇, 吴越, 李向军, 刘凯歌, 楼喜中, 王星博, 周卫东. 猪舍环境精准控制模型及其优化算法[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(3): 24-33.
[12] 赵文文, 仇天雷, 朱君, 王海峰, 贾楠, 李斌. 畜禽粪污好氧发酵多参数监测系统设计与试验[J]. 中国猪业, 2024, 19(3): 34-46.
[13] 于行峰. 环境约束下桂林市生猪养殖业发展思考[J]. 中国猪业, 2023, 18(6): 23-30.
[14] 朱金清,张士海,孟克杰,王以君,陶士东,张宏雨,崔艳,张寅屏,车越. 环境改良剂对断奶仔猪生长性能及舍内氨气浓度的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2023, 18(4): 113-116.
[15] 贾立红,侯正亮,魏海权,王付平,贾立英,房宝娟. 养猪业对环境的污染及防治措施[J]. 中国猪业, 2023, 18(4): 121-123.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!