China Swine Industry ›› 2021, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (5): 44-47.doi: 10.16174/j.issn.1673-4645.2021.05.008

• Husbandry and Forage • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A Comparative Study on Physical Properties of Pig Pellet Feeds at Different Growth Stages

WANG Jinbu, CHEN Guiyuan, WANG Jiale, WANG Yu, QI Shengli   

  1. Henan Agricultural University,Zhengzhou 450046, China
  • Received:2021-09-10 Online:2021-10-25 Published:2021-11-15

Abstract: The physical properties including diameter, length, hardness, bulk density, powder content and PDI (Pellet Durability Index) were measured for pig pellet feeds at different growth stages from a local feed mill. The results were classified and analyzed statistically referring to related standards. The results showed that the diameter was 2.87~3.94 mm with significant differences between each other(P<0.05) and increased with rise of pig age, it was the largest for sow feed and smallest for small pig feed. The particle length was 8.62~11.94 mm, it was the largest for large pig feed and the smallest for small pig feed. The length-diameter ratio was too high. The pellet hardness was 3.86~6.47 kg, it was the highest for large pig feed and the lowest for small pig feed. Hardness of small and medium pig feed was significantly lower than that of large pig feed and sow feed(P<0.05). Only small pig feed met hardness requirement. The bulk density was 576.7~614.6 g/L, which showed significant differences between each other and changed with the same trend of diameter. It was the highest for sow feed and the lowest for small pig feed. The powder content of small pig feed was the highest and only the difference between small pig feed and large pig feed was significant(P<0.05). PDI was the highest for large pig feed and the lowest for small pig feed. All feeds met related standards for powder content and PDI. Therefore, we suggest that feed manufacturers should pay attention to physical indices control by regulation of formula and processing parameters to improve physical quality of pellet feed.

Key words: pellet feed, diameter, length, hardness, bulk density, powder content, PDI

CLC Number: 

  • S828
[1] 杨俊成, 于庆龙, 秦玉昌, 等. 饲料物理性能指标的测定方法[J]. 中国饲料, 2000(17):23-24.
[2] 齐胜利, 李杰, 岳新军, 等. 猪用颗粒饲料物理性能的调查与分析[J]. 养猪, 2012(5):11-13.
[3] 高蕊, 李倪薇, 康宏彬, 等. 一种颗粒饲料PDI测试方法的研究[J]. 饲料工业, 2013, 34(19):53-57.
[4] GB/T 16765—1997, 中华人民共和国国家质量标准—颗粒饲料通用技术条件[S].
[5] Glencross B, Blyth D, Tabrett S.An assessment of cereal grains and other starch sources in diets for barramundi (Lates calcarifer) implications for nutritional and functional qualities of extruded feeds[J]. Aquaculture Nutrition, 2012,18:388-399.
[6] 饶应昌. 饲料加工工艺与设备[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1996.
[7] 于翠平, 赵红月, 黄进, 等. 颗粒饲料质量的控制研究[J]. 饲料研究, 2013(11):83-86.
[8] 方希修, 尤明珍. 饲料加工工艺与设备[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008.
[9] 李令芳. 影响颗粒饲料耐久性指数的因素及其控制[J]. 饲料工业, 2008(1):3-5.
[10] 赵辉, 郭东新, 田河, 等. 环模结构对颗粒料质量和动物生产性能的影响[J]. 饲料研究, 2017(3):39-42.
[1] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 19-23.
[2] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 30-33.
[3] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 34-37.
[4] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 38-43.
[5] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 48-50.
[6] WANG Ziyang, QIU Guobin, QU Yonggang, SUN Qiongfei, DANG Ruiying, ZHOU Haiqin, ZHANG Xiaoyu, ZHAO Yu, CHANG Junshuai. Detection and Analysis of Antibodies Against Common Infectious Diseases in A Scaled Pig Farm in Northern Xinjiang [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 51-56.
[7] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 57-62.
[8] HU Mingpeng, WU Xulong, TANG Jie, YANG Min, ZHOU Chenlu, ZHONG Jiawen, LI Hu, CHI Haomin, ZHENG Yusong. Research Survey and Control Measures of New Epidemic Porcine Circovirus Type 3 [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 63-66.
[9] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 67-70.
[10] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 71-73.
[11] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 74-77.
[12] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 78-80.
[13] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 81-84.
[14] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(4): 13-16.
[15] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(4): 17-21.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!