China Swine Industry ›› 2021, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (5): 51-56.doi: 10.16174/j.issn.1673-4645.2021.05.010

• Swine Disease Prevention and Control • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Detection and Analysis of Antibodies Against Common Infectious Diseases in A Scaled Pig Farm in Northern Xinjiang

WANG Ziyang1, QIU Guobin2,*, QU Yonggang1, SUN Qiongfei1, DANG Ruiying1, ZHOU Haiqin1, ZHANG Xiaoyu1, ZHAO Yu1, CHANG Junshuai1   

  1. 1College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Xinjiang Shihezi 832003, China;
    2Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Animal Disease of Xinjiang Corps, Shihezi 832003, China
  • Received:2021-09-17 Online:2021-10-25 Published:2021-11-15

Abstract: In order to understand the antibodies against common infectious diseases in a large-scaled pig farm in northern Xinjiang, so as to find the potential disease risk of the pig farm in time. In this study, indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect the antibodies against classical swine fever virus(CSFV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus(PRRSV), porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2), porcine foot-and-mouth disease virus type O(FMDV-O), and porcine pseudorabies virus (PRV)gB and gE protein in the pig farm. The test results showed that the overall antibody positive rates of CSFV, PRRSV, PCV-2, FMDV-O, PRV-gB protein, and PRV-gE protein in the field were 83.57%, 90.56%, 90.29%, 71.86%, 82.84% and 18.29%, respectively; antibody levels were uneven among different types of pig herds, the positive rate of PRRSV antibody in breeding herd was only 52.63%, the positive rate of CSFV antibody in nursery herd was only 44.12%, and the positive rate of PRV-gB antibody in fattening herd was only 30.00%, the positive rate of PRV-gE antibody in breeding boars was as high as 30.00%, and the positive rate of FMDV-O antibody in fattening pigs was only 6.25%. Based on the above test results, it provided a reference for the formulation and optimization of the immunization program of this farm and achieving the purpose of effective control and gradual purification of the epidemic.

Key words: antibody detection, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunization schedule

CLC Number: 

  • S828
[1] 古金元, 吕林, 胡东方, 等. 山东省某规模化猪场主要疫病抗体检测结果与分析[J]. 养猪, 2016(4):124-126.
[2] 薛双, 冯艳, 周坤, 等. 猪伪狂犬病在我国的流行现状[J]. 中国猪业, 2012(12):41-42.
[3] 宋敏, 吴圆圆, 屈勇刚, 等. 某规模化猪场主要猪繁殖障碍性传染病抗体检测及分析[J]. 猪业科学, 2019, 36(1):82-85.
[4] 苏晓月, 唐思静, 吕转平, 等. 新疆巴州某规模化猪场主要疫病抗体检测结果与分析[J]. 养猪, 2020(6):102-104.
[5] 刘功成, 张倩, 屈勇刚, 等. 新疆石河子地区规模化猪场猪瘟抗体检测及分析[J]. 猪业科学, 2016, 33(1):80-81.
[6] 蒋福信, 刘征, 王俊, 等. 桂林市规模猪场主要疫病血清抗体检测及分析[J]. 广西畜牧兽医, 2017, 33(2):74-76.
[7] 周恒, 卢天成, 杜恩仲, 等. 宜昌市夷陵区2014-2018年猪瘟、口蹄疫、高致病性猪蓝耳病免疫抗体监测分析及防控建议[J]. 中国猪业, 2019, 14(5):70-74.
[8] 叶淑均, 何述辉, 刘新. 重庆某种猪场猪瘟、口蹄疫、伪狂犬病、猪繁殖与呼吸综合征抗体的ELISA检测[J]. 中国猪业, 2019, 14(2):45-47.
[1] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 19-23.
[2] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 30-33.
[3] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 34-37.
[4] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 38-43.
[5] WANG Jinbu, CHEN Guiyuan, WANG Jiale, WANG Yu, QI Shengli. A Comparative Study on Physical Properties of Pig Pellet Feeds at Different Growth Stages [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 44-47.
[6] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 48-50.
[7] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 57-62.
[8] HU Mingpeng, WU Xulong, TANG Jie, YANG Min, ZHOU Chenlu, ZHONG Jiawen, LI Hu, CHI Haomin, ZHENG Yusong. Research Survey and Control Measures of New Epidemic Porcine Circovirus Type 3 [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 63-66.
[9] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 67-70.
[10] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 71-73.
[11] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 74-77.
[12] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 78-80.
[13] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(5): 81-84.
[14] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(4): 13-16.
[15] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(4): 17-21.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!