China Swine Industry ›› 2021, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6): 36-41.doi: 10.16174/j.issn.1673-4645.2021.06.008

• Genetic Breeding • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on the Effect of Hybridization of Lean Pig Combination

SHEN Xuelin, YAO Man, LI Aiping, HU Yanyan, YU Qiong, FAN Guangjian, XIA Xianlin   

  1. 1Agriculture and Rural Bureau of Kaili City, Kaili 556000, China;
    2Longshan Pig Farm of Wens Group, Majiang County, Majiang 557600, China;
    3Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
  • Received:2021-11-09 Online:2021-12-25 Published:2022-01-18

Abstract: This experiment was carried out for the purpose of exploring the matching hybrid method and effect of lean pig combination. The experiment adopted HN121 (Wynn Duroc Pig), HN212 ( Pitland ♂×Wynn Duroc ♀) as the parent samples, and adopted HN204 (Wynn white ♂×the American white ♀) as the mother sample, to carry out matching hybrid test of two combinations of HN323 combination (HN121×HN204) and HN424 combination (HN212×HN204). The results showed that compared with HN323 combination, for HN424 combination, there were no significant differences in sows' litter size, live litter size, piglets birth weight, survival rate of 21-day old piglets and litter weight at 21-day old piglets between HN424 combination and HN323 combination (P>0.05), and the weight backfat thickness was 5.63% lower, the lean percentage was 4.95% higher (P<0.05), the eye muscle area was 33.08% larger(P<0.01), the carnation score was 7.19% lower (P<0.05), the marble grade was 11.30% lower (P<0.01), drip loss rate was 10.63% higher (P<0.01). The difference of other hereditary traits was not significant. Compared with HN204 binary parent line, for HN424 combination, daily weight-gain increased by 9.26% (P<0.05), backfat thickness decreased by 16.41% (P<0.01), feed-to-meat ratio decreased by 8.02% (P<0.05). Compared with HN204 binary parent line, for HN323 combination, daily weight-gain increased by 7.20% (P<0.05), backfat thickness decreased by 11.43% (P<0.01), and feed-to-meat ratio decreased by 5.35% (P<0.05). Therefore, it is believed that both quaternary hybrid combination and ternary hybrid combination had significant effect on "Large×Long" (HN204) binary hybridization in genetic improvement, "Pitland×Duroc×Large×Long" quaternary hybrid combination can significantly improve lean meat rate and eye muscle area, but meat color, marble grade, drip loss rate and other meat quality indicators changed low. Therefore, it is suggested that pig breed genes which can improve meat quality should be added into the matching hybridization of "Pitland×Duroc×Large×Long" quaternary hybrid combination.

Key words: lean pig, combination hybridization, breeding traits, economic traits

CLC Number: 

  • S828
[1] 陶泽宇, 薛盼盼, 张潇筠, 等. 猪杂交改良研究进展[J]. 家畜生态学报, 2019(4):81-84.
[2] 姚曼, 申学林, 余琼, 等. 一种改善后备母猪繁殖机能功能饲料的研究[J]. 中国猪业, 2019, 14(5):42-44,51.
[3] 庞有志. 我国肉猪配套系育种现状、存在问题与发展趋势[J]. 猪业科学, 2016, 33(7):110-112.
[4] Lei HG, Shen LY, Zhang SH, et al.Comparison of the meat quality ,post-mortem muscle energy metabolism, and the expression of glycogen synthesis-related genes in three pig crossbreeds[J]. Animal Production Science, 2015, 55(4):501-507.
[5] 魏玉明, 魏炳成, 钱振波, 等. 绿洲灌区规模养猪杜长大、皮杜长大杂交猪生长发育性能测定及肉质评定[J]. 畜牧兽医杂志, 2015, 34(4):1-5.
[6] 丁荣荣, 杨明, 全建平, 等. 杜长大三元杂交猪与皮杜长大四元杂交猪胴体性状和肉质性状比较研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2016, 47(9):1795-1805.
[7] 王林云. 非洲猪瘟阴影下中国养猪生产模式探讨[J]. 中国猪业, 2020, 15(3):13-17.
[8] 全国畜牧兽医总站. 全国种猪遗传评估方案(试行)[EB/OL], https://www.renrendoc.com/paper/87117837.html.
[9] 王青来, 吴珍芳, 刘珍云, 等. 华农温氏四系配套猪杂交性能对比试验研究[J]. 养猪, 2006(4):22-24.
[10] 王玉涛, 刘孟洲. 基于杂交猪肉质研究分析的皮特兰猪的种用价值[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2008, 29(1):124-127.
[11] 徐忠, 肖倩, 张哲. 金华猪杂交组合繁殖、育肥、胴体与肉质性能的研究[J]. 畜牧与兽医. 2018(3):6-9.
[12] 梁国明, 彭中镇, 刘榜, 等. 长×大×通、大×长×通杂交猪及其亲本的生长性能、胴体性状和肉品质比较研究[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2017, 44(4):1009-1015.
[1] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(6): 13-16.
[2] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(6): 17-18.
[3] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(6): 19-21.
[4] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(6): 22-26.
[5] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(6): 27-29.
[6] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(6): 30-35.
[7] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(6): 42-47.
[8] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(6): 48-51.
[9] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(6): 52-54.
[10] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(6): 55-59.
[11] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(6): 60-62.
[12] Keanpen, LIU Jigen, ZHAO Yiyi, WEN Huaxin, LUO Chang. Evaluation Test of Digestive Tract Absorption and Utilization of Swines with Tilmicosin Premix of Different Processes [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(6): 63-66.
[13] WANG Ziyang, XIE Jing, OU Yani, QIU Guobin, QU Yonggang, DANG Ruiying, GAO Jiahao. Detection and Analysis of PCV2 Antibody Levels in Some Regions of Xinjiang in 2019-2020 [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(6): 67-70.
[14] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(6): 71-73.
[15] . [J]. China Swine Industry, 2021, 16(6): 74-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!