China Swine Industry ›› 2025, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2): 84-92.doi: 10.16174/j.issn.1673-4645.2025.02.008

• Genetic Breeding • Previous Articles     Next Articles

  

  • Online:2025-04-25 Published:2025-04-25

Abstract: To investigate the effects of different insemination methods on the reproductive performance of sows and to explore the optimal number of effective spermatozoa in the application of automatic bionic insemination (CAPSULE) technology, 340 healthy sows with similar body condition, batch, breed, parity, and age were randomly divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental groups, A1, B1, C1, D1, and E1, consisted of 180 sows in total, with 40 sows each in A1, B1, C1, and D1, and 20 sows in E1, all inseminated using the automatic bionic method. The control groups A2, B2, C2, D2, and E2, consisted of 160 sows in total, with 40 sows each in A2, B2, and C2, and 20 sows each in D2 and E2, all inseminated using the conventional method. The number of effective spermatozoa per insemination for A1 and A2 groups, B1 and B2 groups, C1 and C2 groups, D1 and D2 groups, and E1 and E2 groups were 2 billion, 1.5 billion, 1.2 billion, 1 billion, and 0.8 billion, respectively. By comparing the reproductive performance indicators of the sows after insemination, it was found that the automatic bionic insemination technology significantly improved the breeding efficiency of sows without affecting their reproductive performance. Specifically, the group using 1 billion sperm with automatic bionic insemination (CAPSULE) achieved farrowing rate nearly 20% higher than the conventional method with the same sperm count, along with an average increase of 3 piglets per litter. Thus, the automatic bionic insemination (CAPSULE) method with 1 billion effective spermatozoa performed the best, not only using fewer spermatozoa but also achieving good reproductive results, making it worthy of promotion and use.

Key words: sows; method of insemination; artificial insemination; automatic bionic insemination; spermatozoa number; reproductive performance; delivery rate

CLC Number: 

  • S828
[1] ROCA J, PARRILLA I, BOLARIN A, et al. Will AI in pigs become more efficient?[J]. Theriogenology, 2016, 86(1):187-193. [2] LUCCA MS, GIANLUPPI RDF, MELLAGI APG, et al. Effects of the classification of boars according to progressive sperm motility and the extender type on the reproductive performance of a single fixed-time insemination[J]. Theriogenology, 2021, 161:120-125. [3] WANG Z, LIU BS, WANG XY, et al. Effects of fixed-time artificial insemination using triptorelin on the reproductive performance of pigs: a meta-analysis[J]. Animal, 2020, 14(7):1481-1492. [4] FALCETO MV, SUáREZ-USBECK A, TEJEDOR MT, et al. GnRH agonists: updating fixed-time artificial insemination protocols in sows[J]. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 2023, 58(5):571-582. [5] MILLS KM, ARYAL UK, SOBREIRA T, et al. Shotgun proteome analysis of seminal plasma differentiate boars by reproductive performance[J]. Theriogenology, 2020, 157:130-139. [6] LUCCA MS, DA ROSA ULGUIM R, BORTOLOZZO FP, et al. Reproductive performance of sows inseminated with Semen doses stored for up to seven days in long-term extender in a field condition[J]. Animal Reproduction, 2020, 17(1):e20190121. [7] BALOGUN KB, STEWART KR. PSV-8 effects of air exposure and agitation on quality of stored boar Semen samples[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2021, 99(Supplement_1):210-211. [8] BROEKHUIJSE MLWJ, GAUSTAD AH, BOLARIN GUILLéN A, et al. Efficient boar Semen production and genetic contribution: the impact of low-dose artificial insemination on fertility[J]. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 2015, 50(Suppl 2):103-109. [9] WABERSKI D, RIESENBECK A, SCHULZE M, et al. Application of preserved boar Semen for artificial insemination: past, present and future challenges[J]. Theriogenology, 2019, 137:2-7. [10] 王南山. 深部输精对母猪繁殖性能的影响[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2022, 18(5):75-76. WANG NS. The effect of deep insemination on the reproductive performance of sows[J]. The Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding, 2022, 18(5):75-76. [11] VIGO D, FAUSTINI M, VILLANI S, et al. Semen controlled-release capsules allow a single artificial insemination in sows[J]. Theriogenology, 2009, 72(4):439-444. [12] CORCINI CD, MOREIRA F, PIGOZZO R, et al. Semen quality and reproductive performance after artificial insemination with boar sperm stored in a gelatin-supplemented extender[J]. Livestock Science, 2011, 138(1/2/3):289-292. [13] MELLAGI APG, WILL KJ, QUIRINO M, et al. Update on artificial insemination: Semen, techniques, and sow fertility[J]. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 2023, 90(7):601-611. [14] WILL KJ, MELLAGI APG, BERNARDI ML, et al. Perspectives of intrauterine artificial insemination applicability in gilts[J]. Ciência Rural, 2021, 51(5):e20200612. [15] ROZEBOOM KJ, REICKS DL, WILSON ME. The reproductive performance and factors affecting on-farm application of low-dose intrauterine deposit of Semen in sows[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2004, 82(7):2164-2168. [16] WILL KJ, SILVEIRA DF, MUSSKOPF MN, et al. Reproductive performance in gilts following applications of different insemination doses and techniques[J]. Theriogenology, 2021, 160:26-32. [17] BORTOLOZZO FP, ZANIN GP, CHRIST TS, et al. Artificial insemination and optimization of the use of seminal doses in swine[J]. Animal Reproduction Science, 2024, 269:107501. [18] LLAMAS-LóPEZ PJ, LóPEZ-úBEDA R, LóPEZ G, et al. A new device for deep cervical artificial insemination in gilts reduces the number of sperm per dose without impairing final reproductive performance[J]. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2019, 10:11. [19] GARCíA-VáZQUEZ FA, MELLAGI APG, ULGUIM RR, et al. Post-cervical artificial insemination in porcine: the technique that came to stay[J]. Theriogenology, 2019, 129:37-45. [20] 吴丽艳, 熊汉成, 戴琦, 等. 常规输精与自动仿生输精方式对后备母猪繁殖性能的影响[J]. 中国猪业, 2023, 18(1):42-46. WU LY, XIONG HC, DAI Q, et al. The effects of different insemination methods on reproductive performance of gilts by conventional insemination and automatic bionic insemination[J]. China Swine Industry, 2023, 18(1):42-46. [21] 熊汉成. 猪自动仿生输精与普通人工输精效果的对比试验[J]. 猪业科学, 2022, 39(4):112-114. XIONG HC. Comparative experiment on the effect of automatic bionic insemination and ordinary artificial insemination in pigs[J]. Swine Industry Science, 2022, 39(4):112-114. [22] 王燕春, 叶放, 任广辉. 深部输精与自动仿生输精(快配舒)方式输精效果对比试验[J]. 猪业科学, 2022, 39(3):106-107. WANG YC, YE F, REN GH. Comparative experiment on the effect of deep insemination and automatic bionic insemination (rapid insemination)[J]. Swine Industry Science, 2022, 39(3):106-107. [23] 唐志明. 自动仿生输精方式与常规受精对母猪繁殖性能的影响对比[J]. 猪业科学, 2023, 40(10): 104-106. TANG ZM. Effects of automatic bionic insemination and conventional fertilization on reproductive performance of sows[J]. Swine Industry Science, 2023, 40(10):104-106. [24] 王佳辉, 黄宣凯, 高圣玥. 不同输精剂量、有效精子数对母猪繁殖性能的影响[J]. 现代畜牧科技, 2022, 41(4):70-71. WANG JH, HUANG XK, GAO SY. Effects of different insemination doses and effective sperm count on reproductive performance of sows[J]. Modern Animal Husbandry Science & Technology, 2022, 41(4):70-71. [25] 陈亚静, 付雪林, 刘望宏. 种猪常温精液不同密度对母猪受胎率与产仔数的影响[J]. 农业与技术, 2020, 40(22):136-138. CHEN YJ, FU XL, LIU WH. Effects of different densities of normal temperature Semen of breeding pigs on pregnancy rate and litter size of sows[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2020, 40(22):136-138. [26] 李玉杰, 王庆伟, 刘长恩, 等. 不同输精方式及输精剂量和次数对母猪繁殖性能的影响研究[J]. 中国猪业, 2019, 14(7):40-43. LI YJ, WANG QW, LIU CE, et al. Effects of different insemination methods, doses and times of insemination on reproductive performance of sows[J]. China Swine Industry, 2019, 14(7):40-43. [27] 邓亮, 朱琳, 邓秀丹, 等. 不同密度和剂量猪精的深部输精对母猪繁殖性能的影响[J]. 猪业科学, 2021, 38(1): 111-114. DENG L, ZHU L, DENG XD, et al. Effects of deep insemination with different concentration and doses of boar Semen on reproductive performance of sows[J]. Swine Industry Science, 2021, 38(1):111-114. [28] 朱琳, 赵云翔, 熊长根, 等. 不同有效精子数的深部输精技术对母猪繁殖性能的影响[J]. 猪业科学, 2019, 36(9):46-48. ZHU L, ZHAO YX, XIONG CG, et al. Effect of deep insemination with different effective sperm count on reproductive performance of sows[J]. Swine Industry Science, 2019, 36(9):46-48. [29] 邓双义, 张伟, 王世银, 等. 冷冻精液子宫内深部输精对母猪繁殖性能的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2020, 56(8):132-135. DENG SY, ZHANG W, WANG SY, et al. Effect of deep intrauterine insemination with frozen Semen on reproductive performance of sows[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2020, 56(8):132-135. [30] 孙志峰, 焦福林. 猪冷冻精液深部输精技术应用研究[J]. 养猪, 2020(6): 33-35. SUN ZF, JIAO FL. Application of deep insemination of frozen Semen in pigs[J]. Swine Production, 2020(6):33-35. [31] 董高华, 曾相春, 黄晓峰, 等. 适度深部输精对母猪繁殖性能的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医文摘, 2017, 33(9):79-80,76. DONG GH, ZENG XC, HUANG XF, et al. Effect of moderate deep insemination on reproductive performance of sows[J]. 1, 2017, 33(9):79-80,76.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!